For me it’s quantum computing - especially considering its impact on most current encryption methods

  • ShadowRam@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Realistic Batteries. It’s holding back a LOT of things. A lot of technologies are solved, but just require power.

    Semi-Realistic Room Temperature Super-Conductor.

    If that can be solved, the power density and efficiencies would just be astronomical… It would absolutely destroy multi-billion industries overnight.

    Way-Out-There-Stuff If they ever prove out an actual functional EmDrive-like thruster, that would absolutely open up space travel to our species.

  • JVT038@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Regrowing / regenerating certain body parts.

    This could theoretically be done with stemcell stuff, but it’s not there yet. However, when we finally reach the point where we can infinitely regenerate our body cells, we’ll become effectively “ammortal”; unable to die due to natural causes (such as illness), but we will still die from other people (for example, a bullet to the head)

    Besides that, I think nuclear fusion would be an incredible development if we can finally harness it to power our homes.

  • Tolstoshev@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fusion. I think it’s our only hope of making it through climate change without massive losses.

      • Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I agree with this. The extreme weather keeps getting significantly worse YOY, and a recent extreme temperature spike in the antarctic has scientists worried that our timeline is a lot shorter than previously estimated, which means significant action needs to be soon.

        We are making excellent progress with fusion, especially the recent development to use AI to keep the magnetic fields containing the reaction stable, but how long will it be before we have a material that is strong enough to withstand the heat of a literal miniature sun for the years at a time required to run a plant? Just the energy from the magnetic field is strong enough that they’ve developed a super efficient was to use those microwaves to bore holes through the earth’s crust hundreds of times deeper than ever before. So we have to at least come up with something significantly stronger than the pressurized material 2km deep into the earth’s surface.

        I am and will remain on the fusion bandwagon, but putting all of our eggs in that basket is a baaaad idea with the current state of things. On that note, that crust-boring technique i mentioned should make geothermal much more viable.

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not going to happen I don’t think not while hardware is cheaper than development costs

      • Pantherina@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I disagree. But these improvements are often low level, so that Meta can save costs doing the shit they do

        • flashgnash@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          All well and good but at the higher end they’re writing applications in JavaScript and electron and using many times more system resources than C or rust, and it will always be cheaper for them to develop in higher level languages (especially when the performance problem can be offloaded on the user’s machine instead of their own servers)

            • flashgnash@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s not laziness it’s economics.

              It’s cheaper for companies to have their developers spend less time developing in higher level languages and just throw more hardware at the problem than spend more money developing in a more difficult language

              They aren’t concerned with energy or material efficiency, only financial

              • Pantherina@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Only their own specifically. Our economy wants people to only care about themselves. Even though this doesnt make sense as polluting the earth will directly impact you.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      self hosted services that automatically and safely scale to global p2p services is about to happen

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Any information about any of those things? I’m quite interested!

        I’m the creator of a network protocol (and working implementation :-) that is based on self hosted nodes, that let’s you share/link to whatever data, say a html page, a video etc. Encrypted, overshared (so your node doesn’t need to be up for your data to be accessible), and decentralised. Based on reciprocal sharing so no money or luck involved.

        I’m being bad at promoting it would be an understatement, I would love just contributing to all this obviously coming decentralised sharing.

        Cheers

        • jimmy90@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          There has been a few attempts; zeronet and one from bittorent themselves that was dropped (I wonder what happened to that).

          None of them have been used to create the killer app that has inspired the required network effect for mainstream usage. I guess finding the magic architecture that works and becomes sticky is the key. There are so many ways to do it!

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Reusable rocketry, specifically SpaceX Starship. If it pans out it’s going to completely change our access to space and make many of those old dreams from the 1970s plausible.

    RNA vaccines for basically everything, including customized vaccines for cancer. There’s also actual progress happening in general cures for autoimmune diseases.

    Is robotics too close to AI? There are multiple companies working on general-purpose humanoid robots intended for mass production with price targets in the ten to twenty thousand dollar range, we may be getting within sight of actual robot butlers.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m really not looking forward to the commercialization of low earth orbit, and SpaceX seems to be an accelerator of this.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Low Earth orbit has been heavily commercialized for decades already. If you mean Starlink specifically, what’s wrong with it?

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Ah, that only happens right after launch when they’re still bunched together. Once the satellites get into their final orbit they spread out. The newer models also have anti-reflection systems that make them much harder to spot, SpaceX has been working with astronomers on that.