The only marketing I don’t hate is handwritten signs by the gate to a farm with addendums like “manur: $free$”

As it turned out, the llama planes were not what Jacob hoped them to be.

Oh I agree, what I mean is that the similarities were barely even superficial. They were both hero shooters, but so are Apex Legends and Rainbow Six Seige, and you’d never compare them to Overwatch.

because it was superficially similar to Overwatch it absolutely bombed.

Sort of, the real issue was it had no advertising of its own, just Randy Pitchford synergising buzzwordsalad on twitter and trying to create a rivalry with Overwatch. Nobody really knew what it was supposed to be from advertising, because nobody thought to just say “FPS MOBA”.

I doubt they’ll be issuing retractions but they claim it’s all updated with the latest science, so probably.

To my knowledge she got away without any real consequences - last I heard she had the same position at one of the competitors.

One time I got back from annual leave only to find out that my job had been done away with by the board over a year beforehand and my manager had spent the last year submitting fake timesheets claiming I was working a different position, so I could do the parts of her job that the assistant manager wasn’t already doing. The company had assumed I knew about it as they couldn’t get in contact with me when they discovered it and came down on the manager (my job was only the beginning of her fraud), but I was in the middle of nowhere and had no signal, so the first I heard about it was when I walked into the office and one of my coworkers went “what are you doing here?”.

Amazing article, just for this phrase:

the inventory of drugs [Hunter S.] Thompson consumed for what could broadly be defined as recreational purposes

Really accurate tape measure.

Diagram of when I learnt about capitalism

The alternative is sitting down, having a talk, drinking some tea and talking about our differences.

You really don’t understand that the things you say have meanings, do you?

The alternative is sitting down, having a talk, drinking some tea and talking about our differences.

You literally talk in your other reply about how you’ll join them. You can’t just sit down and talk about how they want to kill the jews and you don’t - your willingness to hear them out inherently legitimises their ideas as being reasonable and able to be reasoned about.

I know you don’t fully understand how the way that you say something can be as informative as what you actually say, but I don’t need to assume - you did actually tell me in your comment that you don’t really mind nazis as long as they’re not being violent towards you.

Ok, but it’s what telegram has. So would you rather keep your “free” speech and put others in danger, or lose it to keep others safe?

Just Google the paradox of tolerance. It’s really not as complicated as you’re making it out to be.

Also, punching Nazis is always morally correct. If you wouldn’t attack a nazi because they’re not currently threatening you specifically then you won’t develop any additional moral prerogative in time of civil war - you’ll join them, because they’re still not threatening you specifically, while fair and equal redistribution of resources will effect you. You don’t have any sort of morality or ideology underlying your objection, you just think extreme things are bad because you’re not given a choice.

Are you sure they’re not saying “you’re whale cum”, because that’s what I do.

Bukak-tree

Don’t you have a baby mobile to be gurgling at?

Gonna change your question to “dog”, as that’s what I have

1. I would choose basically any other life over my worst enemy’s. In a choice between them and no one, I’d save no one. I feel you don’t understand how emnity works.
2. Better question, dog,
3. because he’s a member of my family that I’m responsible for. As annoying as his theivery is and as bad as his farts are, he’s my friend. Would you choose a stranger over one of your friends?

And still you avoid the question, because you have no idea about art or machine learning. You just think the patterns are pretty.

All those mountains of images and you can’t even link a single one and explain what about it shows creativity.

Anyway, you can’t be so stupid as to not know what my problem is, I’ve spelt it out specifically in every single comment: My problem is that you won’t give an answer to my question (as a reminder, that question is “how will an AI show creativity?”). Use your words to provide an explanation, backed up with specific linked images to demonstrate it. Stop saying “uhhh i saw it on ebaumsworld” when you’re asked for an actual explanation articulated through language.