• comfydecal@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    So if everyone in the US stops buying publically traded companies, it would bankrupt the top 10%?

    • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Only if you’re including the top 10%. The vast majority of retail investing makes little difference even when combined, in comparison to institutional investing.

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you mean a small tax per share when purchased then that would be a great idea. Make high frequency trading, that contributes zero to society, unprofitable. It wouldn’t hurt household investors as the tax would be small but it would hurt the assholes who manipulate prices through trading back and forth.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        High frequency trading is fully automated insider trading done in broad daylight, but nothing gets done about it because most people don’t understand what it is. It shouldn’t be taxed; it should be illegal.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s a long and convoluted route from that to their 401ks not bring as plump as they could be. Indirect robbery of thousands is more palatable than being mugged for a few dollars.

    • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Abolishing the stock market in general would be nice, or at least moving towards that direction gradually. The wealthy don’t typically get their money from great trading, but parking their money and letting it grow.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The stock market itself isn’t the problem either though, it’s that the wealthy have money and the poor do not. If you want to buy a house and you don’t have the cash for it, you need to borrow from someone…and that means someone who has a lot of money. And you’ll pay interest for the privilege because there is a time value of money. That doesn’t go away without a stock market.

        The real solution is to tax the wealth itself, either directly or through taxing the step-up in value after the owner of a stock dies, or a massively increased estate tax.

        • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The stock market shouldn’t be abolished without also abolishing other aspects of Capitalism, yes. Workers must currently take advantage of everything they can within the current system. However, people should be striving towards worker ownership of the Means of Production, and keeping the stock market would allow Capitalism to resurface.