Colorado’s Democratic-controlled House on Sunday passed a bill that would ban the sale and transfer of semiautomatic firearms, a major step for the legislation after roughly the same bill was swiftly killed by Democrats last year.

The bill, which passed on a 35-27 vote, is now on its way to the Democratic-led state Senate. If it passes there, it could bring Colorado in line with 10 other states — including California, New York and Illinois — that have prohibitions on semiautomatic guns.

But even in a state plagued by some of the nation’s worst mass shootings, such legislation faces headwinds.

Colorado’s political history is purple, shifting blue only recently. The bill’s chances of success in the state Senate are lower than they were in the House, where Democrats have a 46-19 majority and a bigger far-left flank. Gov. Jared Polis, also a Democrat, has indicated his wariness over such a ban.

    • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The goal isn’t to beat the cops. It’s to defend against neonazis.

      Do you think the cops are gonna disarm neonazis? Or will they just use gun bans as an excuse to murder more black people?

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Guns dont defend shit. We have all the guns, its not going well. A gun ban at least slows down supply. And starts a long path to becoming like developed countries that arent murderous gun nuts like we are.

        • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Tell you what. How about you pass a law to disarm people based on their hateful ideologies FIRST. Make Nazism illegal, then disarm, prosecute, and imprison the neonazis, by force of law. They are currently trying to ignite a new Civil War against America, yet you want to disarm the rest of us in the face of that.

          Fix that, then we can discuss disarming law abiding citizens.

          You gonna address the question I asked? Cops only use gun bans as an excuse to kill more black people.

          • blazera@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I think youd have a hard time defining and identifying nazis in legal terms.

            And i dont trust any gun owner to be a law abiding citizen, we’re all animals that can get very emotional. And we have the results of that in our horrendous homicide rate.

            • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Really? Because Germany managed it. Nazism is illegal there. They prosecute anyone who professes Nazi ideas. I don’t care how hard it would be. You think confiscating all the guns is easier?

              I don’t care who you trust. I care that this nation is too foolish and cowardly to root out the cancer it has harbored since long before it was founded. Ban sympathy for the Confederacy. Ban Nazi ideology. Prosecute those who profess it. Ruin those who fund them. Cleanse the police departments of all the Nazi cops. We will never be free of them until the day we make their ideologies illegal.

              Until then, piss off trying to disarm the millions of people who only wish to defend their homes from exactly those people pushing for civil war.

              Gee whiz, you sure don’t want to address the fact that cops only use gun bans as an excuse to murder black people.

              • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                just a heads up, west germany famously integrated nazis into the government and still has them to this day.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      You ever seen cops shoot?

      I’ve seen a bunch of 'em get DQ’d from matches for being unsafe, or drop out when it was clear their scores were trash.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          They use hacks like ESP and wallhacks.

          In all seriousness, though, it’s only because they always outnumber and have more resources than the person/people that they are in a shootout with. Not because they are better with firearms than an average gun owner who also trains with their firearm.

          • blazera@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            and have more resources than the person/people that they are in a shootout with.

            Yeah, and that’s what you’re up against thinking your guns are keeping the government in check.

            • bastion@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Not really. At the point where there’s consensus that we are, in fact, in a civil war, then:

              A) you’re not some nutjob holed up in his house using his neighbor as a hostage B) there are others, and organization is doable

              Yes, the government has organization and experience. Hopefully, it’ll just never be an issue. Likely, there would be internal divisions, as well. But being ready for it to be an issue can both help prevent it becoming one, and give one the capacity to have an impact if it does become an issue.

              • blazera@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                If things get to an actual civil war where tyrannical government is willing to use its resources, i think you are severely underestimating the resources. The satellite and drone intel, the ability to destroy routes civilian vehicles can take, the aerial strikes. Civilians arent gonna get together no matter the heads they can put together and build competing anti air capabilities. Its not like a battle of damage numbers in a game, its ability to even play the games that they can. Like a well armored knight fighting against squirrels, the numbers dont matter, the little claws cant get through steel.

                Likely, there would be internal divisions, as well.

                Thats all you can hope for, thats the only way civilians in any developed country survives:having a government that doesnt want to kill them. Armed population or not, it really has no effect.

                  • blazera@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    The whole premise theyre defending is we should have guns to defend against the US government. If the US government actually wanted to kill them, thats what they would be facing.

            • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              …And yet, when cops see protestors that are as heavily armed as they are, historically they suddenly get very, very respectful. When the Proud Man-Children discover that the BLM protestors are armed and disciplined, they suddenly lose all their courage. Cops suddenly get really, really nervous when they realize that if they start shit, they aren’t going to have a numerical advantage. When you’ve got one suspect and 20 cops though?

              Cops aren’t there to protect or serve the people; they’re there to protect and serve the status quo.

              But damn, people sure do hop on cops’ dicks whenever someone says they might want to be able to protect themselves rather than hoping that cops will do it.

              • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Gun grabbers will say they don’t trust police and then say they’re the only ones who should be armed in the same paragraph. It’s wild.

              • blazera@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                I think most examples of armed protests in the US are on the side of police. But US police are also an example of America’s problem with too many guns, they kill way too many people and should also have fewer guns.

                • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Many, yes. But people on the left are slowly starting to learn the lessons that the Black Panthers and Malcolm X were trying to teach us. (…The lessons that ultimately got Malcolm X killed, IMO.) Groups like the John Brown Gun Clubs are working with and helping to train activists in order to for them to protect themselves from Proud Man-Children, and “Patriot” groups, since cops won’t.

                  Power is never given willingly; power must be taken. The police have power, and asking nicely gets you nothing.