The company’s team clarified that their terms prohibit third-party apps from disabling ads, as it denies creators their due reward for viewership. Although the announcement did not specify any app by name, it’s plausible to presume that third-party YouTube apps such as NewPipe, YouTube ReVanced, Piped, and others might be implicated.

  • YouTube is the only one that doesn’t have an alternative. I mean, there are other video hosts yes, but the content isn’t there.

    The creators need to start moving. Their fans will likely follow, since it’s not YouTube they are there for. But I don’t think anyone else offering free, large scale video hosting does much more, if even that, than what YouTube does. Even if it sucks, it’s better than nothing, so there is no incentive to move for anyone.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Most of their fans won’t follow. Convenience is a powerful thing.

      There also really aren’t other options. Anyone being able to sign up and host video for free is an extremely expensive service to provide if people take you up on it.

      • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        If enough creators moved, the fans would follow.

        Unfortunately, the creators won’t move to a platform that doesn’t have users to watch them. And users won’t bother with a platform that doesn’t have creators to watch.

        While this can be overcome… Yeah, I think googie will need to fork up yootoob a lot more before enough on both sides are willing to jump ship en masse

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Some fans would follow. If 100% of their subscribed channels moved tomorrow, 90% still wouldn’t move to the new platform for a meaningful length of time.

    • xyx@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Problem being that there is no real incentive to do so, unless PeerTube finds a way to pay content creators. Until then, switching away from YouTube means loosig their revenue stream…requiring them to take up jobs to pay the bills and eventually have less time for content creation.

      Living on donations and patreon alone is hard…

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nebula is trying to be the alternative. It’s a paid subscription and not as plentiful as YouTube is (and maybe never will be).

      But it’s a good try, give it some support, if you can

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It isn’t much better in terms of content moderation though. In fact probably worst.

        They kicked off JT, of Second Thought one of the original creators, for refusing to make a both sides statement about Palestine.

    • deleted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I tried Nabula twice. The latest in 2020.

      Service is fine but their UI + search and discover is awful. Like I can barely find creators I like when I search for their exact channel name.