fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 days agoEvidencemander.xyzimagemessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1404arrow-down126
arrow-up1378arrow-down1imageEvidencemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square90fedilink
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoMaybe there were other big bangs, but we need evidence of that, and that evidence doesn’t exist. Jyst saying “but we don’t know” isn’t a replacement for evidence.
minus-squareColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·4 days agoThere’s no evidence that time started at the big bang, either. So it’s silly to say.
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 days agoNot how it works. “Time exists” is a positive statement. We need evidence for positive statements. There is no evidence of time until the big bang.
Maybe there were other big bangs, but we need evidence of that, and that evidence doesn’t exist.
Jyst saying “but we don’t know” isn’t a replacement for evidence.
There’s no evidence that time started at the big bang, either. So it’s silly to say.
Not how it works.
“Time exists” is a positive statement. We need evidence for positive statements. There is no evidence of time until the big bang.