top right: view by category. switch that to classic and it’s back to the same one of the old days

by selling me a license that lets me run their software on my own machine, not theirs. Like in the old times

Yes, a different cuestion usually has a different answer

going to “C:\Users\user\Documents” in explorer, vs just typing in “documents”. One takes you to your documents folder, which will be empty, the other takes you to some other path from onedrive

~/code/$LANGUAGE/$REPONAME

on some sites the plugin fails to properly detect which fields correspond to which, true (usually when javascript fuckery is involved). But fixing that by manually pointing out the fields once on such sites is easy enough for me. I also switched firefox to use keepassxc for passkeys, which makes them actually portable and usable for me.

asking such an open ended question doesn’t mean much when nowadays, more and more people consider “anything I don’t agree with” to be hate speech.

what sucks about keepassxc?

here’s to hoping. I don’t use gnome personally, I prefer kde. But I’d rather there be more than one big player all the same.

maybe they should try listening to their users. Maybe that would increase donations

this is so games can render at half the framerate, but the fps counter doesn’t show it right? Yay? I guess…

To whom it may concern,

MURDER! MURDER! MURDER!

Yours truly, Maurice Moss

no, it wouldn’t. Because the car is not filled with aerosolized explodey-gas, but just flammable liquid contained in a robust tank. it is not explosive. It can catch fire, but not simply from impact. You’d need a hole in the tank lower than the current fuel level and an external ignition source. Even if you shoot the gas tank directly, it will not explode. It is physically impossible for it to explode.

Puncture one of an electric car’s cells, and it sets off a chain reaction. The whole car very quickly goes up in flames.

extensions are not supported in gnome. gnome devs do not care in the slightest if they break them whenever.

a > 30000 vehicle that won’t be available for a decade

matrix multiplications. lots and lots of matrix multiplications. What gpus are good at already

the exact same intended use case, in fact

not really. A lot of techniques have been known for decades. What we didn’t have back then was insane compute power.

and there’s the turing award for computer science.

and physicists use tools from math, so fields medals should be awarded to physicists.

yeah, so that means that it’s not incremental improvement on what we have that we need. That will get us nowhere. We need a (as yet unknown) completely different approach. Which is the opposite of incremental improvement.