I expect the American pro-Israel politicians who threw hissy fits for «free Palestine» slogans to take appropriate stances for a literal fucking nazi salute on Inauguration day.

Of course also the Israeli government, the German government, etc.

Come on, you fucking assholes. Dare you fucking speak up?

🥾👅

super offended, couldn’t sleep all night

bonne journée

The Arabic countries are more aligned with Russia and China?

Saudi, Egypt, Jordan, UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain, Tunisia: are we a joke to you?

Dragonslayers. We need dragonslayers. 🐉 🗡️

I’ve some of them in my family and my friend circles, so, yes sure.

Thoughts and prayers.

We don’t want their guns, the litigiousness, the exceptionalism and the arrogance, but other than that, we actually love Americans.

I call for the Mercedes-Benz CEO to go fuck himself.

How long do they calculate until personal porn information is leaked?

Super standard, which is exactly why initially the police denied doing it 😒

Hahahaha, what a predictable asshole.

I think the ceasefire was agreed to start on Sunday.

I hope they send him the bill for the work-hours the police wasted. What a tool.

Early 20th century analog: politics in the US and Canada is beholden to the steam engine lobby, while China is moving to corner the combustion engine market.

We’ve been telling conservidiots that climate change is a national security threat for decades. But nooooo, they keep rolling coal like the knuckleheads that they are all the while pretending they are smart independent free thinkers. Fucking idiots, man.

Ditch the GDP, it doesn’t count what truly matters in a civilized society anyway.

You keep using that word. I don’t think it means what you think it means.

Lol, you aren’t engaging with my argument at all. What even is the point of this interaction?

In the article you posted elsewhere in the thread she is quoted as saying:

“In my respectful dissenting opinion the dispute between the State of Israel and the people of Palestine is essentially and historically a political one. It is not a legal dispute susceptible to judicial settlement by the Court,”

I think we would both agree with Mark Kersten, cited in the article, that she’s wrong about that.

It explains however why she would vote the way she did. She is of the opinion that the court does not have jurisdiction, and the rest of her behaviour follows from that. That again does not constitute bias, it constitutes a consistently held (albeit wrong, according to Mark, me, you, and the court majority) opinion.

Listen, I am standing up for her not because she’s right, but because I think that politically this narrative of pro- and anti- Israel justices serves the Israeli Apartheid establishment in undermining the authority of the court.