For the few people who didn’t already watch it, and the best movie of all time :
Mad Max: Fury road (2015 ) by Miller .
This is what film story telling is about: having an entire weird universe told through visual medium. The 1st half hour has mad max gagged and incapable of talking, and it is amazing. Preferably on big screen.
A gem from the past:
Taboo(1999), by Nagisa Ôshima,
a samurai movie with hint of homosexuality. and an ending that can only be understood by paying close attention to the sound off screen.
A classic:
Seven samurai(1954), Kurosawa.
Just enjoy the black and white shot , and immerse in old Japanese culture
It is an okay movie, with some flaws. Rain surge to ultra competence out of nowhere being indeed the most outrageous.
Here is my few thousand words theory about the movie:
In the film “Alien: Romulus,” the title purports (as in “Prometheus”) to reference the name of the ship. Yet, akin to “Prometheus”, it is a ruse. The film alludes to the tale of the two brothers from antiquity, Romulus and Remus. Let us recall this story, penned in 800 BC, which itself inspired the myth of Abel and Cain (with its earliest written traces dating back to 400 BC):
Romulus founds the city of Rome by plowing a furrow to mark the location of the new city’s walls. According to Roman legend (which favors Romulus, the founder of the capital), Remus mocks his brother and challenges him by leaping over the furrow. What might begin as an innocent jest between two brothers turns tragic: Romulus slays his brother Remus for this act. Romulus justifies his deed by declaring that no one shall ever breach the ramparts of Rome.
It is evident that Romulus is not the hero the Romans would have us believe. He is the killer, the villain, the Cain of the Jewish narrative.
In the film, which is a precise reiteration of Ridley Scott’s original “Alien,” it is more expedient to identify the differences between the two films than to find their similarities. There exists but a single distinction between them: there are two siblings.
Rain and her brother Andy.
Kay and her brother Tyler.
In the first “Alien” of 1979, the crew shares no familial ties. However, as in “Romulus,” they approach a vessel that has emitted a distress signal. They must explore this ship. The diverse crew (a mix of male and female, Spanish and English) does not get along. They must encounter the aliens. A facehugger attacks a crew member. A chestburster escapes from a human body. The heroine is clad in scant attire to emphasize her vulnerability in her struggle against the primary alien. An alien is ejected into space as the heroine screams, “Take that, you son of a bitch.” For, as in “Alien,” the heroine is a woman, and the sole survivor, while the men exhibit toxic masculinity and meet their demise.
Of course, the most significant commonality (and the key to the film’s true message) is the android Andy. While Rain is presented as the main character, there is no doubt that the true hero of the film is Andy. Rain has no reason to be so effective against the aliens. How can she conceive of utilizing the ship’s gravity when she is a “space virgin”? How does she wield a weapon when, unlike Tyler, she has never shown a passion for combat? How is she so resolute when the film’s beginning portrays her as ineffectual (to the extent that others assure her she will not have to leave the ship)?
Certainly, Rain is the heroine, for Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) was in the original “Alien.” Yet Ripley was a pilot, and the rest of the crew admired her worth at the film’s outset. Thus, when she acts with such determination, it does not come as a surprise, as it does with Rain. Andy, on the other hand, though initially depicted as weak, becomes competent with a mere change of programming. This is why the android in the film appears more credible than the suddenly indestructible Rain, who lacks explanation for her transformation.
The issue with Andy lies in his name. In the four preceding films of the series, the androids are named in alphabetical order: In the first film, “Alien,” the android is called Ash. In the second film, he is named Bishop. In the next, it is Call. In the previous film, “Prometheus,” he is called David (which presents another problem). Therefore, Andy should have a name beginning with an E, as he appears here in the fifth film of the series. In the film, Rook, the other android, refers to Andy by his construction designation N.D. Does the android’s name begin with an N? Is the film meant to be the 14th in the series? Unlikely. No! Andy begins with an “A” because he is the twin brother of Ash, the first android in the series.
Returning to the legend of Romulus and Remus, as in the legend, Andy kills a sister, Kay, by refusing to open the door for her to escape the alien. Similarly, Rain kills a brother, Tyler, when he rushes toward her and is struck from behind by the alien’s prehensile tail intended for Rain.
Two deaths that are more symbolic than real. The evidence: having endured an assault worse than her brother Tyler, Kay manages to reach the ship. Tyler should have survived. So should Kay, if she had not used the product developed by Weyland Industries. The deaths of a brother and sister at the hands of another brother and sister merely echo the film’s theme: to kill Remus.
For this is precisely what Alvarez attempts here. Like in the Roman legend, his film is the twin brother of the original “Alien” from 1979, replicating scene for scene the same narrative. Just as in the legend, “Alien: Romulus” claims to establish a new series, one superior to that which followed “Alien” in 1979. Like in the legend, “Alien: Romulus” seeks to slay its brother, “Alien: Remus” (1979). Alvarez hopes to rid himself of the entire legacy and strength of the original “Alien” by employing the symbolism of the Roman legend. As in the tale of Abel and Cain, “Alien: Romulus,” out of jealousy, attempts to kill the film that started it all. Undoubtedly, like in the legend, we are not deceived and take sides with the original “Alien.”
Hum I doubt even the majority of mod are “anti marxist” or “pro zionist”… may be you’re looking at the more active communities, with few mod over them… But for what I read I never had that impression
The problem with chronological forum, is that it was a used tactic to post massively new topics to “hide” some controversial topic on the “second page”. Not to say that voting doesn’t have its own problem.
I heard about Catalhoyuk yesterday… So i have no clue how scientist are perceiving it. But the construction: all together under the same roof, with no street, is pretty striking.
Obviously this dude calling it “anarcho communist” is biased… the wiki article seems to purposely avoid a neutral tone to make it clear.
But I can see why he came to that conclusion. I dont think we have any other settlement even remotely resembling this one, to make a more informed guess
i needed your comment to realize I forgot to put the wiki link. You can forward your complaint to Bookchin ;)
Noting the lack of hierarchy and economic inequality, historian and anti-capitalist author Murray Bookchin has argued that Çatalhöyük was an early example of anarcho-communism.[40]
how would you describe it? a no street settlement? a roof way village? a gigantic family house?
So you think if something is bad enough it is ok to discriminate again. Meaning you place the bar of disparaging some contend at around average value , so not at high elite value.
That can hold. It still depend on your value judgement of the content in question. Someone could think that lemmy.ml contend is “unfunny garbage”.
The point of a site like this one, is that not one person is the decider. Not you or me. Users vote what is or is not funny, so that the “avergagely” funny systematically go on top. The more people they are, the more the average will mirror the real world population… I think considering the average population to not be “worthy” is pretty elitist. There are a lot of problem in such a site: Hive mind, trolling, mass vote, bot usage… But discriminating against normal human user (even the worse one) doesn’t seems to me like a solution
this is a very elitist approach camarad
Microwave, I never had one, because, I never wanted to eat ultra-processed microwaved food.
But now , I use it all the time:
So now all my meal are more healthy just because of microwave, which seems counterintuitive, but is true.
great! good FF!
And they get it back to a small downward arrow… which was here prior, and never bothered me.
The problem with the new button was it size, and the fact it looked like a tab on its own.
where the link to the download?
too late indeed
Is there any other physicist in the world?
very interesting, but anything about Jack the ripper is, thanks for the link
some sperm on a prostitute shawl? Yeah this woman had some client no wonder we find DNA on her, it is a stretch to go from client to killer.
This story is old: Jack the Ripper: Scientist who claims to have identified notorious killer has ‘made serious DNA error’
my favorite theory is:
Mary PEARCEY, Jack the Ripper according to sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Mary Pearcey, like many other famous Victorian-era murderers, has been suggested as a suspect in the Jack the Ripper slayings. She was apparently the only female suspect mentioned at the time. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, creator of Sherlock Holmes, speculated at the time that the Ripper might have been female, as a woman could have pretended to be a midwife and be seen in public in bloody clothing without arousing suspicion or notice.
This theory was then expanded upon in 1939 by William Stewart in his book Jack the Ripper: A New Theory, which specifically named Pearcey in connection with the crimes. All evidence given is circumstantial, and there is no physical evidence or eyewitness reports linking Pearcey to the Ripper crimes.
F. Tennyson Jesse, the British criminal historian, explained the theory in her study of Pearcey’s case: “It was no wonder that, simultaneously with the discovery of the crime, legends should have sprung up around her figure. The rumour even arose that the notorious Jack the Ripper had been at work in the locality, and though this was quickly disproved, yet the violence and horror associated with the crime was such as to make it understandable how the rumour arose in the first place. Even in the earliest paragraphs which announced the discovery of the crime, several false statements were suggested.”
In May 2006, DNA testing of saliva on stamps affixed to letters allegedly sent by Jack the Ripper to London newspapers, and thought by some modern writers to be genuine, appeared to come from a woman. This led to extensive discussion of Pearcey and her crime in the global press.
You’re making a strawnman : nobody is falling or being abused
congrats! you’re body must be nicotine free by now, you must feel so good! For me it took a whole month to get over the mental addiction, but you already beat the worse part
It just me, I dont like long serie (except thoses will self contained episode) Even something I liked, the 3 body problem, had 2 full episode (close to the end) of filler in 1 season. And they already got past the 1st book in that season, so they have room to 1 or 2 more season at best.
5 season?.. no way I can invest in that, but cool for those who can enjoy this kind of show
Some women in Swiss were only allowed to vote in 1984.
Cleopatra is closer to us than she was from the great pyramid construction.