Which is customized for every patient, so it currently costs $500,000 and isn’t FDA approved for wide use, AND it is only available inside the US in a limited number of facilities.

Still, it’s very promising, and if it holds up, it’ll eventually be more widespread. At the end of the article it says they’re working on a more generalized approach that could lower the cost and increase availability.

There’s a saying you might want to get familiar with

“If everywhere you look, all you see is assholes, maybe you’re the asshole.”

That’s half the plot of Armageddon (1998)

Am… am I from New York? That’s exactly what I would do in that situation.

Interesting take. I really enjoy when artists can reflect on their work decades later.

I read this wrong as “Gilbert Gottfried never got to play a Ferengi Therapist” and now I’m double sad.

D) Move manufacturing and other dirty processes off planet and live here.

You’re putting words in my mouth and exaggerating my statements. Just look at how the NASA manned space programs have run since the start, AND how they are currently run. Congress puts a lot of stipulations on how they are manufactured. NASA has a big problem with congressional interference.

Their science/unmanned programs are different, because congress is more hands off. Those are running just fine. The problem is that SpaceX is a huge cost and has a lot of manufacturing and jobs associated with it. That invites congressional interference.

Not only that, but they also have a large commercial presence already with the Starlink. The government doesn’t typically run things like that, so they’ll probably sell of the Starlink portion of the company.

It’s not a conspiracy, it’s not libertarian-ism, it’s just how NASA is run. Once the budgets get into the billions, congress can’t keep their hands off it.

Yes, there are certainly problems with the Commercial Crew program right now, just look at how Starliner is run. We probably won’t get a capsule from Boeing, because they don’t have an incentive to finish, due to the fact that it’s not a cost+ program like the SLS is. SLS is also constrained by politics, they are required to use so many Shuttle parts, just to keep those sub-contractors happy.

It could, but that’s not how these types of programs get run. They’re as much about making jobs in specific areas as they are about solving a problem.

Problem is that if SpaceX becomes part of NASA, then it’ll be like the space shuttle. It’ll need parts made by every small company that contributed to some random representative in every state, so we’ll end up with 300+ contractors all building critical components.

Hot tip, change HIS last name prior to the wedding and she gets the name change free.

I know a couple that waited until after the wedding to do that and the husband changed his name, then the wife was given the option of keeping her old name, or switch to his old name.

She ended up having to go through the entire name change process without the benefit of the auto-name flip from the marriage.

According to a US Army study, Iron and Tungsten could create galvanic action, causing both materials to degrade if in contact.

https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA358781.pdf

So at first glance, it seems like this combo wouldn’t last as long as it could with just Tungsten.

If you use a web email account, just create a draft email and don’t send it. Then log into your email account on the other device and read it there.

The Teletubbies are the Elois from HG Well’s The Time Machine.

This shows that AI isn’t an infallible machine that gets everything right — instead, we can think of it as a person who can think quickly, but its output needs to be double-checked every time. AI is certainly a useful tool in many situations, but we can’t let it do the thinking for us, at least for now.

No, it’s not “like a person who can think.” Unless you mean it’s like an ADHD person who got distracted halfway through the transcript and started working on a different project in the same file.

Nicer looking graphics than can play on my computer, that’s for sure.

I open the picture on my computer, then screenshot it before uploading.

That removes any association with the original picture without relying on any exif stripping that might miss a hash or weird embedded info.

My wife agrees with you for literally one reason.

What’s stopping him from just making infowars2?

His rage is his commodity, so I don’t get why he can’t just start up a new channel and just do the exact same thing.

Wait, how exactly could a crypto hash connect a vote to a voter and still be anonymous…