Perhaps, but think of it this way: you likely have money invested or money that is invested on your behalf, whether that’s personal, 401k, IRA, or government pension. Those are likely investments spread across many companies - so should your carbon footprint take into account what those companies are doing?

I’d suggest that companies should be responsible for their carbon footprint, and legislated accordingly. Pushing it to investors, or on their customers, just seems like passing the buck.

Including investments seems a bit disingenuous. I’m sure their personal carbon footprint is already huge without having to include that.

Have you tried a 20-hour gaming break?

Used to love the back sensor. I could unlock my phone as I was taking it out of my pocket

Jesus, that’s dark

Election drinking bingo. Back to you, Wolf.

BrittneySpeare

Love when he takes off his shoes

Fair. It’s all hyperbole these days.

That’s over 10% though

Right meow

Unless I actually have mud or dirt on my face, it only gets cleaned with water in the shower. Dove soap bar for rest. Pure aloe vera (or as close as possible) applied to the face to help with dryness when needed.

Thanks friend!

I’d like to phone a friend

Yes, it will be the most important thing in my life. I even brought my divorce papers here to prove it.

So… This is Snake. A snake is sort of like a big worm thing. No no, not like you…

That has to be one of the best IT crowd episodes.

You can even call me a foot doctor, because I help rappers with defeat.

Tbh, you’re probably right. It’s the same reason that solar finally is seeing an uptick, and how cryptography works. Solar makes financial sense now, and cryptography is all just about how much money you would need to spend to crack a password.