![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
Nope, he’s not the official nominee until after the convention. Still not gonna happen, but technically could.
Nope, he’s not the official nominee until after the convention. Still not gonna happen, but technically could.
I’m amazed prodigy lasted long enough to be distributed on CD.
Doesn’t the use of VoIP often make these hard to trace, as well?
It’s saying they’re eating an ostrich’s egg, not that the ostrich is eating an egg.
Well that’s largely because so few companies are doing agile correctly. Its usually some form of agilefall.
And those recipe changes were probably aimed at lowering costs, not increasing quality.
There are a lot of entry level jobs that basically assume new employees know nothing, anyway. Seems like this will just further devalue degrees and emphasize work experience for hiring.
That’s true for soda and beer lines, too…
If you look at the straps on her outfit,it looks like it’s two people.
This is true of a lot of large companies in general. The fact that they make money in spite of this shows how much the markets favor established players.
I thought they were bagels with an entire block of cream cheese at first.
This country is so completely fucked.
It’s state by state, I believe.
Every piece of software that’s available in Russia or China has to comply with their laws. Their laws are fucked up. This is also very easy to circumvent.
Sure, a lot of times they’re just letting other people lie through their products.
I really don’t think there are enough trans people competing at the highest levels to sustain that though.
“Drugs” are a pretty broad category of thing, it’s unlikely that you’re ever going to get an honest answer out of anyone, and it’s even more unlikely that anyone using illegal drugs who wants a gun is going to not buy a gun because of this. It’s just more war on drugs bullshit.
I’ll also add that if people were actually worried about the competency of people buying guns to own guns, then it would make far more sense to put the burden of proof on the person buying to prove their competency. But that’s not what this law is really about.
Funny how people elected under the two party system aren’t super motivated to change it.