That makes no sense. Wouldn’t that make Android 15 B and 16 C?
That makes no sense. Wouldn’t that make Android 15 B and 16 C?
Not when devices with rolling screens are on the horizon.
You underestimate the opportunity of selling a single device that costs significantly more than both combined (this one literally does).
Idk about no crease but Samsung’s appear to be the most noticeable from what I’ve actually seen. I think other manufacturers have improved on this over time but I haven’t seen anything newer than my Pixel Fold in person.
IIRC display and chip manufacturing are basically treated like separate businesses from the phones as a product. And all the other companies foldables are better than Samsung’s (imo at least) because they haven’t innovated or improved in several generations.
I’m not a Samsung fan by any stretch, but this I would love to see.
Android Automotive OS is a blank slate for car manufacturers to customize and claim is their own creation, consumers will never know it exists.
It’s definitely not great, but considering one is for consumers and the other is explicitly not it’s not that bad.
Well yeah, it’s pretty common knowledge that all those cheap TV boxes running AOSP (not Android TV) are crap and should be avoided.
This thing costs $2800…
This. They fucked up the one thing that made the original the best Foldable ever made IMO. Hopefully they get it right next year.
What a life you must have. Must be nice to be so blissful ignorant and naive that you never once consider that you are wrong, not the entire rest of the world.
Yes. And a “bifold wallet” has a single fold that bisects the wallet into two haves. A “trifold wallet” has two folds that divides the wallet into three equal parts.
This is how these English words are used. Look it up…
I realized this completely misses the point, but the problem is actually dust not water. All these foldables are IPX8, meaning they are highly water resistant but not rated for dust and debris.
I completely agree with your repairability point btw.
The number refers to the number of sections the fold(s) create, not the number of folds.
Example: Bifold and Trifold wallets.
Huh? Each hinge will be doing exactly the same thing as every other foldable for the last 5 years.
Why would it need to lock? It’s no different than a normal foldable in that regard, the hinges are firm and hold in the position you put it.
I’m going to be honest, I actually know a lot more than I can say on this matter. But believe me Gemini Nano is a multimodal LLM.
I spoke to Google engineers about this a few months ago:
I don’t run GrapheneOS. Convenient you are all of the sudden too lazy to prove you are right or have a clue about what you are saying.
You are aware that those are often called LMMs, Large Multimodal Model. And one of the modes that makes it multi-modal is Language. All LMMs are or contain an LLM.
It would be cool if you read the first paragraph