I think you may be on to something. That may be a better way to describe it.
I think you may be on to something. That may be a better way to describe it.
If you consider taxing the rich. Unions and attacking companies as far right then sure. He’s always been far right. It sounds like you’ve never read about Vance and that’s why you don’t see the radical change from who he was to supporting Trump.
Vance actually had really good ideas until he went Trump. A mixture of far left and middle right politics. Now you never hear his working class ideas.
It’s hard to imagine this is the guy who said declare war on corporations
His mentor says hillbilly elegy was written to propel him into politics. So I find it hard to believe he wasn’t interested when that was the reason for the book
Not sure who those people are but they don’t seem well versed on the topic.
If you haven’t read the most recent SCOTUS ruling. It foreshadows their views on the topic. SCOTUS determines want is constitutional.
There hs enough case law from scotus to point to wealth taxes as being unconstitutional
Judges have immunity. So the lawsuit won’t go anywhere.
It’s amazing how immunity people in power have
Wealth taxes are unconstitutional in the United States. It would require an amendment to change that.
Capital gains should just be taxed an ordinary income. That would solve a lot of issues such as Medicare, social security, etc.
It’s his passion project. It’s not “working” when it’s something you love.
He just put an injunction in place which is common. It just means the case has to be decided first.
If he’s accusing them of venue shopping. I suspect he’s going to rule against them.
I’m generally against acquisitions for this reason. So many companies just want to be acquired instead of running a company.
I can’t think of one large acquisition that benefited consumers
Considering they don’t fly. Pretty hard.
Fallout four seemed to flat. I loved all the other games. Just not that one.
Thank you. I was pondering why put foil on door knobs.
Used in the context you claim, it’s even more of an idiotic thing to say.
The company is being fined. It’s a real penalty. Since we don’t know how much product was sold, we don’t how punitive it is but damn, when the government gets a win you take it.
Well they should pick up a dictionary and learn what the word means.
Write off means write off the books. Otherwise it makes no sense as that the dictionary term for the phrase. You can’t write off a fine. It isn’t “written off”.
Real the whole paragraph. It’s idiotic talk
On a handful of products? Doubtful.
At least the government gave them a fine which is a step in the right direction. Country of origin is important to me. I buy based on those labels
Removed by mod
Did they make 200 million selling those products ?
Canada isn’t under the jurisdiction of American law.