It takes emotion to make rash decisions based on reactionary feelings.
If you only do things because it feels right instead of what you’ve thought through and understood as a rational course if action… you’re doing the same thing as those who storm capital buildings cause an orange man told them to.
Don’t worry, should it ever happen, there’s plenty of wannabe Napoleons who would be willing to step in to take over once theyre gone :)
The problem is, if they’re afraid they have the resources to do something about it. That much wealth can buy a lot of private armies. It also buys a lot of lobbyists.
It takes more thought and planning then reacting with emotion against them. That feeds their goals just fine.
And affordable.
“Don’t hate the companies, hate the people who lobbied for copyright laws… the companies!”
Perhaps that’s the level of chocolate? Like you can have 90% dark chocolate, this is 40%.
Don’t worry, they’ll still use your data.
Did you see more premise in the trailer than I did? Cause aside from one or two lines “Can the living and the dead co-exist” it’s mostly just loosely connected “Hey look” moments.
I prefer Stardew Valley
I am ambivalent.
Just like humans are basically just trees, because they’re both carbon based lifeforms, right?
I’d imagine they pass overhead in a similar way to that total solar eclipses do.
So… useful then?
Yeah, but at about 400 degrees higher than silicon.
If you have an nVidia video card it can be helpful.
Keeping it updated without their godawful GeForce Experience bullshit is a bit of a pain, though. And it has limited settings.
That’s what post-its are for!
Everything is 99% grey area. If someone tells you something is completely black and white you should be suspicious of their motives.
But you didn’t say you had proof with your comment, you said it was probable. Basically saying its common sense that its proven.
Why are you getting aggressive about actually having to provide proof about something when saying its obvious?
Also, that seems to imply that locking up people for AI offenses would then encourage truly reprehensible behavior by linking them with those who already engage in it.
Almost like lumping people together as one big group, instead of having levels of grey area, means people are more likely to just go all in instead of sticking to something more morally defensible.
They’re basically online loyalty accounts like you’d have at retail stores.