![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
> when you don’t read to the end of the bible so you don’t know why the US really wants Israel to exist
> when you don’t read to the end of the bible so you don’t know why the US really wants Israel to exist
Some of us live in functioning democracies where “switch to USB-D” won’t come with an “it’s illegal to give your son a name that wasn’t previous a job title” attachment.
Can I ask what the point of this screed was? I’m aware blanks are dangerous. That’s irrelevant. There was a real bullet in the chamber. At some point, even if it was a blank, it would have been pointed at someone and the trigger pulled.
The point appears to be “check the damn weapon”, which of course you could have said without ‘educating’ me, and wouldn’t have been undercut with going on endlessly about wadding.
That point is a terrible one because the armourer is the expert, and is the one who should be signing the gun off as safe every time it is opened, not an actor who neither is required to have qualifications nor skills in clearing a gun as safe. If an actor interferes with the weapon, the armourer has to check it again.
Wouldn’t the live round have shot someone no matter what? The point of a blank round is so you can aim a gun at someone and not kill them.
He was a producer but that’s a meaningless title handed out to anyone who will front a little money or indeed sometimes just give some advice.
You are being tested on your comprehension of the text given, not asked for your opinion on piracy and copyright.
What on earth are you talking about? What start button is in the middle?
This attitude towards the downvote button came from reddit, because Reddit started hiding responses with an arbitrary number of downvotes, which most Lemmy clients emulate. That’s how it stifles conversation.
Is this in answer to something or just a passing thought?
Outright stating that you are trying to destroy conversation- congrats, you have provided a great example of a real reason to downvote.
I don’t know how you got from point 1 (which is valid - but do you think there aren’t Germans who will say yes?) to point 2?
How does an something being an answer on a survey make it a reasonable answer? If surveys should be limited to reasonable answers, how do we ever quantify how many unreasonable people exist?
The downvote button is not the “I disagree” button. It’s a “this is irrelevant or destructive to the conversation” button. “I get what you’re saying but I disagree” to me indicates you don’t think my comment was either.
If the question was phrased as “Is the German national team diverse enough?” - which asks for the same opinion - would that be somehow better?
This type of finger-in-ear nonsense is the type of behaviour that leads to Germans supporting a genocide in 2024 and AfD’s success being a surprise.
I don’t think a survey question can be racist. An answer can, and I’m not sure that not knowing the answer is better than knowing it.
Edit: No wrongthink on feddit.de, got it.
Oh I’m sure it’s not wasted work. But any content delivered now, for free, is in direct competition with buying a whole new game, probably for >=$70. I guess they’re very confident in the new game modes or something.
I’m surprised to see this update- I thought MS were making a “new” Flight Simulator for this year. I’m aware that content creation and game creation are usually quite separate but odd that they’d be release stuff to “keep” you on the “old”/current FS iteration.
I mean they fucking advertised it as such when I bought it
tourists
Must be really strange to have all those tourists come to your mountain top.
They don’t need to scrape Lemmy. They just need a federated instance and then they have literally everything you post delivered to them as part of the way Lemmy is designed.
Please understand literally nothing on Lemmy is private.
Yeah I agree, it seems to be built on the same components as VScode and VScodium. Honestly, I don’t see the point… yeah, sure, they want their editor to work on the web, but couldn’t they have don’t that with a GUI lib that compiles to WASM?
Yeah I agree, it feels like it’s only for open source purists aka a minority.