Hey we need the grant money.
Hey we need the grant money.
Sorry where is the ‘neuroscience’ in the article?
deleted by creator
Oh my mistake there then. Rockhoppers are one species that are monogamous for life.
That doesn’t explain why the same couples keep coming back to each other season after season.
Dolphins have been observed engaging in purely recreational sex.
Penguins are monogamous and that applies to gay penguins as well.
Here’s two that built a nest together https://mashable.com/article/same-sex-penguin-couple
Animals don’t think “I’m gonna go find another dude to have gay sex with,” they just get the urge and act on it with whoever looks good nearby.
Several animal species are famously monogamous, penguns for example.
Wouldn’t it be more concerning if it was speeding up?
What do you mean, your employer has lots of freedom to exploit you!
He’s been firmly out of Trek since Enterprise.
And Rick the Dick Berman said fuck no, in fact here’s a blonde bombshell in a catsuit. Fuck you.
Boeing having a normal one.
And when it does, how would you even know?
For now…
Roger Penrose was brilliant, but he got a lot of flack for his Orch-OR theorem which is being alluded to here.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestrated_objective_reduction
I still don’t understand what problem his hypothesis was trying to solve though.
That seems somewhat unrelated to this paper about foraging societies.
If I can quote the authors:
We caution against ethnographic revisionism that projects Westernized conceptions of labor and its value onto foraging societies.
Two ways to do something, the right way and the Janeway.