NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ

You’re so close to the answer. Now, why are PC gamers the ones still on 1080 and 1440 when everyone else has moved on?

To be fair, I’ve been on there calling the fascists and Trump apologists out. The pennies they get from ads pale in comparison to the fact I bought a Tesla years ago womp womp 🙃🙃🙃🙃🙃🫤

Their preferred candidate was literally “anyone but Trump.” Reap what you sow.

LMFAO

I just put on full self driving while I mess with the touchscreen. I’ve only hit 4 toddlers max in the last couple weeks.

Reminds me of some guy with a OneWheel that was saying he’d never charged his board in like a thousand miles as his daily commuter.

He lives near the top of a mountain lift, so he takes it home and just runs on pure regen lol.

Huh?

I’m sorry, you were saying…?

Here’s the problem: they view a clump of cells as more of a human than they view a woman as a human 🙃

Yeah, but yall are actually cool and bust out the guillotines every once in a while.

I think more than “dweebs” buy consoles…

Also you’re on Lemmy you dweeb lol

Seized or not, they can not force you to unlock your phone via pin without a warrant. They can only force you to use biometrics.

You can enable lockdown mode. It forces the next unlock to ignore biometrics and require a pin, which police cannot force you to divulge without a warrant. Once enabled, you get a “lockdown mode” option in the menu when you hold down your power button.

I feel like the language chosen was very specific for good reason.

Capitalism.

No country would be insane enough to embargo the single greatest economic power on Earth.

It’s Mozilla. No one is going to see this anyway.

I hear what you’re saying, and you’re 100% correct, but I think most people will realize it’s a figure of speech, and easier to say than “Via the process of gene mutation trial and error over many, many generations of tigers, spots have developed on their ears that look like eyes, resulting in predation from behind being discourged.”

Fair enough, I suppose it is interesting!

In terms of the question, “Are there more infinite sequences that contain Hamlet or more that don’t?”- in the context of true randomness and truly infinite sequence, this feels like almost a trick question. Almost every truly random infinite sequence will contain Hamlet an infinite number of times, along with every other possible finite sequence (e.g., Moby Dick, War and Peace, you name it). In fact, the probability of a random infinite sequence not containing Hamlet is effectively zero.

Where it becomes truly interesting is if you have an infinite number of infinite sequences. Now you’d certainly get instances of those “effectively zero” cases, but only in ratios within infinity itself, haha. I guess that’s probably what you were getting at?

I could have worded that better. Any probability with a non-zero chance of occurring will occur an infinite number of times given an infinite sequence.

To address the comment you linked, I understand what you’re saying, but you’re putting a lot of emphasis on something that might as well be impossible. In an infinite sequence of coin flips, the probability of any specific outcome - like all heads - is exactly zero. This doesn’t mean it’s strictly impossible in a logical sense; rather, in the language of probability, it’s so improbable that it effectively “never happens” within the probability space we’re working with. Theoretically, sure, you’re correct, but realistically speaking, it’s statistically irrelevant.