That’s because they changed the 4-design.
That’s because they changed the 4-design.
And yet, the ultra right found the expression of “green filth” due to one minor case of irregularities of a few officials who got into office before the department it is associated with got a green secretary.
Btw, the Greens are the party with the fewest scandals of all parties that were ever in a german government (and at least one that (luckily) never was). And it ain’t even close.
Yes, of course a product that is less available, more expensive and has potentially more hurdles to obtain will be bought less, but that’s not what I meant and these things are specific to sweden and don’t necessarily apply to the rest of Europe.
Tesla being a company with shitty morals and being owned by an asshole is nothing that influences buyers’ decisions enough large. Look at other brands that build their cars with forced labor in china. Are people buying fewer of those cars?
I like your optimism. But I’ve seen too many people still buying products from questionable manufacturers in full knowledge of the issues and with alternatives available.
Unfortunately, stuff like this doesn’t seem to influence buyers’ decision making.
No, there is no definition of Nazism in the Grundgesetz.
No that’s impossible. The (there only ever was the SS, not an number of them) SS was the paramilitary arm of the NSDAP, the political party of Hitler. And it was dissolved with the Third Reich before the Grundgesetz was adopted.
Seeing the impact drone warfare has on Ukraine battlefields, I can imagine lasesrs being used as drone defense systems. Many drones have sensor equipment near their front that can be interfered by lasers which is easier than shooting down the drone with conventional AA fire.
Regarding AI and how much aiming weapons is computerized nowadays… Yeah, I’d guess AI is a publicity thing here.
That’s what I mean by fascist rhetoric. Their election program is more economically libertarian than the FDP though.
AfD is not “conservative right”. AfD is anarchokapitalism with fascist rhetoric
Don’t make this a false dichotomy. Neither excludes the other. The person you replied to is building a strawman, don’t try to counter that by a false dichotomy that also includes a new strawman.
Unfortunately, the Portuguese suit was unsuccessful, because it was “too far reaching” according to ECHR, the can’t sue more than their own country and haven’t gone through their own country’s legal system before sueing in front of the ECHR.
Only the swiss seniors’ suit (try saying that three times as fast as you can lol) was successful.
FCK Frontex and the idea of Fortress Europe. The make the Mediterranean Sea a mass grave.
Europe doesn’t have a migration problem, it has an integration problem.
Demographic changes affect the whole continent. We need migration to keep pension funds and healthcare insurance alive.
We just completely failed to integrate migrants into society, fight poverty (especially among the youth) and offer chances to grow and self realize.
No, but until now, Poland and Hungary protected each other. Things might change now.
No, it’s because there is no electoral threshold for EU elections in Germany. Every party with enough votes for a seat gets that seat (which is projected to be around 0.5% but depends on the total number of voters). Unfortunately, this is the last election without a threshold in Germany