What does Nintendo make that isn’t related to games?

But they’re shit because the people who work for them take all the money. With the cap greed is a much smaller factor and would likely lead to those charities to either get their shit together or shut down

Edit: and you’re right in an ideal government charities wouldn’t even be necessary because taxes are handling everything a charity would but it will never be perfect and I think giving people the option of where their earned money goes would be a lot less aggravating than being forced to give it to the US government

But doesn’t that have a lot to do with the fact that millionaires and billionaires are buying property and jacking up prices? If the cap is 1 million and someone sells their house for 1 million, if they make any more money that year, it goes to taxes. That would give incentive to people to actually live life instead of being completely focused on the rat race. I don’t think 1 million is a good cap, certainly not with the value of the dollar being what it is. However, I do think setting a cap and having it automatically lower a little bit every few years is a good idea. That would need to also be accompanied with a limit on liquid assets to be gradually taken down as well, if anyone is hoarding money, they would be forced to either give it away or donate to charity if they didn’t want all of it going into public programs. There shouldn’t be limit on what someone can buy/own.

My entire family and a few others

I’ve been getting them almost yearly since for 20 years and I never noticed a difference

It’s always been a circle but I still enjoy a lunchables pizza every once in a while. I definitely don’t get it if I’m in the mood for pizza but it’s a good snack. I get the pepperoni and the extra cheese and make a bunch of them with a couple pepperoni and extra cheese

It didn’t age well imo

What are you talking about? Nobody mentioned politics in this thread.

There are smart homophobes. They use science, however flawed it is, to promote their arguments. Cutting out religion would take care of the few vocal people who genuinely believe being gay is against their religion but it definitely wouldn’t take care of the larger problem which has always been xenophobia.

I didn’t know what it was called, but I think it’s common knowledge at this point that banks don’t actually have all our money. Pretty sure we (Americans at least) found that out during the great depression when everyone was trying to withdraw their money at the same time.

Dog groomers get almost zero legal repercussions for mistreating dogs. It has to be undeniable that the groomer injured the dog on purpose before anything really happens. That’s why it’s SO important to trust the person grooming your dog if they’re the type of breed that needs it.

Thank you for elaborating the actual case, this makes sense.

This is obviously a victory for humanity overall, but does anyone think the Supreme Court could take this new definition and use it to take guns away from regular people? I’m an idiot so if anyone can tell me why this isn’t a possibility, I’ll be relieved. The thing is, if Trump getting elected again does lead to the fall of democracy in this country (which I doubt, but it’s definitely more possible than any other candidate we’ve ever had), couldn’t the Supreme Court take guns away from people who opposed him?

Never seen teeth?

But still safer than roads. Which was my point.

You just spelled out why it’s safer to stay on the sidewalks than I ever could have.

I don’t think Newton was dumb enough to think air resistance isn’t a factor

Bicycles are much harder to see than other cars while on the road. It’s safer for bicyclers to stay on the sidewalk and look both ways before crossing any street, unless there is a bike lane.

If you stay on the sidewalk and look both ways before crossing the street, there are no risks of a car wreck.