https://nypost.com/2021/07/14/more-die-of-cold-medias-heat-death-climate-obsession-leads-to-lousy-fixes/

2500 people die because of heat… Sure it sucks but that’s like almost nothing

https://nypost.com/2021/07/14/more-die-of-cold-medias-heat-death-climate-obsession-leads-to-lousy-fixes/

Nice strawman argument, not really what I said haha

It does not matter whether you’re poor or minority or what. In Europe we all have to suffer. And 31°C is also quite common here in summer and barely anyone as AC.

There are some edge cases where it would make sense to have a right to it (medical conditions e.g.) but besides that I think it’s just an american privilege debate.

Most American take ever…

How is a ‘right to AC’ gonna solve climate change lol.

While I understand your frustration, intuitive UI/UX is ‘real’ and not just a marketing gag. But you have to invest the money and the time to do proper user research.

Haha

Gimp works fine… but it’s not intuitive and the UI/UX is horrible.

work very intuitively

I only ever used gimp

…to its full potential 💪💪

Not really the fault of the EV then tho :D

Daaaamn crazy story. Scary you can just tap out like that. Good on him he didn’t get injured too much

What was the issue? Do you know?

Works for me. Mb try a vpn

Yeah if I’d be her I’d rather cut my finger off than do that tbh 😅

If she uses software from CC and not only stores data there then I don’t think anything will be able to replace it without frustration. You have to get used to a whole different workflow.

The right Deezer Downloaders have Flac tho

All these news pieces about A.I. killing ancient company xyz …

I mean we’re here in the comments to exchange perspectives primarily. Never saw anyone quoting research papers. There’s no rule about forbidding comments to be biased or opinionated. So I’d say our access to any form of potential objective truth, as fundamental basis for discussion, is fairly limited. World news is not only about scientifically validated facts. It’s rather a fast paced informational feed, where you have to balance speed and factual quality.

And we had context for the anticar lobby comment, so it’s not like the person said: look, here is the irrefutable truth from an independent source. They rather said: Look here are some reasons for why XYZ is bad.

I don’t have a problem with it, besides it being a lazy and hard to read solution.

I’m not sure if you know what objective truth means, but why would you expect it from an anticar lobby sub? Like, it’s a political movement… not a scientific research facility? It’s not their goal to be objective, but to push for change. Not saying the things they stated are wrong, but they are first and foremost moral statements.

Where do they say it represents a form of ‘objective truth’?

But I agree walls of text are not nice, at least try to summarize it a bit to make it readable…