Why did he leave the magazine though? What if he would have encountered some pet dogs later that day?
Why did he leave the magazine though? What if he would have encountered some pet dogs later that day?
You are using critical thinking. Please stop.
No. It’s from the Fallen Angels miniseries.
Read his comment. Then read the post’s title. Then read his comment again.
Something of literally human value may be in his basement.
Sir, I’m gonna have to inspect your basement.
This may be the first confirmed case, but it’s probably not a good idea to make it the poster case for pro-choice. Let’s look at the facts:
The article says the clinic in North Carolina could have performed that procedure, but does not state why she was not brought there. Maybe her condition was too bad for the long travel? Maybe she was evacuated to the nearest hospital (a decision which does, generally, make a lot of sense) which could not have signed her away for an illegal (by Georgian law) operation outstate? Maybe it was medically and legally possible to drive/fly her there, but it was too expensive for her? Either way - it is clear that the ban on abortions in Georgia (made possible “thanks” to the Roe vs Wade overruling) is the direct reason why she could not get the treatment which could have save her life.
BUT!
The pro-life camp can easily pin this on the abortion pills, claiming that a nation-wide abortion bad would have prevented her from receiving them and therefore would have prevented her death (and the aborted twins’ death. They won’t forget to include that)
If he thinks something doesn’t matter just because the people involved are dead, maybe history is not the right academic field for him.
Meatn’t
XML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.
Yup that’s what I mean.
Seems like a reasonable limitation then (not that the entire business model of scientific journals is reasonable in the 21st century is reasonable - just this specific limitation). The journal’s theme is proprietary, but the paper’s authors still have the LaTeX source so they can just slap a free preamble on it and publish it with that.
So basically the article you are allowed to release can have its typesetting - it just can’t have the journal’s preamble/theme?
or even sometimes the peer-reviewed, but NOT typeset article
What does that mean? The LaTeX source?
It’s mostly a cargo cult.
“Your brakes operation will resume after this 10s ad”
But they do see that this works. They see the rich and famous getting out (often on bail, but who cares about details?) on technicalities, and think they can do it as well. They fail to appreciate, of course, all the expertise and all the legwork that these lawyers needed in order to find these loopholes for their clients.
I’m a different person, but also from lemmy.world and I don’t use an app. I don’t see any heart heart symbol around the voting buttons. It’s probably just your app.
You are assuming here that I know what I want. What if there is no obviously correct answer, and even in the Everett branch that generates the optimal content for the file I’ll still think it can be improved and tell it to destroy the universe?
In other words - like 99% of the laws: good
publicityintentions meets reality.