swim

Making it dangerous to smoke while in transit. I see why the people ones didn’t catch on in the 50s.

Very cool, I’ve never seen the ones that can send a person. Can they breathe in transit?

The bootlicking version of “why do you need privacy if you have nothing to hide?”

How Nonviolence Protects the State

This Nonviolent Stuff’ll Get You Killed

You are 100% correct.

… that is there question.

Would you say what you’re seeking is “more intimacy,” up to, potentially, the most possible intimacy?

I would suggest looking at his different interests and getting curious. If you’re interested in the guy, it should be pretty easy to find reasons why this film or that game are endearingly-this-or-that in a way that makes you like and respect him even more.

Then, you bond over it; by trusting his taste (intimacy) enough to check out that show or whatever interest, you now have an opportunity to get deep (intimacy) into what you each individually felt (intimacy) about it, and maybe you felt something in common. That’s some foundation for intimacy.

I’m pretty sure I only said it was wrong.

Not only is “common” unfortunately not a quantitative assertion (and I disagree), many incorrect usages are “common.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_shake

As earlier stated, obviously some people might use the opposite words for a particular effect.

It’s just not the accepted and used English for those actions. If it was something like “rotated” then it would be ambiguous and subject to interpretation, but the word “shook” already has a meaning

And their point is that they are wrong to do so.

We already went over it, I hit him so no refunds

Ya but you got that DAWG in you

Oh yeah well im bigly better at gulf than you

What? What? Fat chance, jack

etc.

Lol bad take

Reference

But I’ve read they have since mitigated the traceability of their pizza eating through various means.

Yes, and I feel like the Republicans as you describe them would aptly be called “creepy.”

And I think “cringe” is often a feeling of second-hand embarrassment.

“Weird” and “strange” are more general and synonymous with “unusual” and “peculiar.”

None of that is in disagreement with your take, though

This is a christian server

“I was wondering if you knew about your employer”

Well, an assumed connection between legality and morality is perhaps part of the disconnect.

Having sex with 16 and 17 year olds is not morally wrong *simply because they are legally considered minors and you an adult.

Having sex with 16 and 17 year olds is considered morally wrong, by some, because the state of their mental maturity is often far below that of an adult even 5 years older. Consider the biological “growth” of the human brain; having not fully developed, their behavioral maturity follows suit. This means their ability to reason, their ability to act in their own best interest, is less than your own. At a certain level of disparity, this imbalance is usually considered “taking advantage” of someone. Asking them to do things they have less an ability to understand than yourself starts to look a lot like coercion.

*ETA

I think it could very well be dissolving at least a coating. I would use more dilute IPA. 👍