• 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      You’re gonna get downvoted because of 8.1.

      But yes, I do agree, 8.1 was great, a lot better than 10. The problem with it was the start menu (easily fixable) and the fact that MS didn’t invest money or time in it after 10 came out, so a lot of bugs went unfixed.

      • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I never minded the metro menu tbh.

        It’s funny that windows tried to do what is done on Linux (gnome) and Mac and got blasted for it.

        I use a full screen style start menu everywhere else.

        • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          It was way too early. If that happened after 11, very few would mind. But it happened way too early. 7 had the classic 6.x kernel start menu, and 8 suddenly had… no start menu button at all 😬. That was their mistake, way too much change way too early.

        • Peasley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          i never liked the inconsistent window management though.

          On 8, (i dont remember for 8.1) there were some apps and menus that forced “tablet mode” and could only be interacted with in fullscreen. Other applications would open in what looked like tablet mode by default but you could break them out into desktop mode, after which they behaved normally.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Exactly like XP, Vista was horrible until a couple of service packs. Then it was better than XP SP2 and release Windows 7.