• haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I highly suggest starting to familiarize ourselves with federated git repos. I‘m testing forgejo atm hoping to be able to host it publicly at some point. That way, once something is out there, its pretty much everywhere.

    • eratic@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Federated git repos doesn’t mean that the source code will be replicated across instances. It just means you can do things like create tickets and pull requests across instances.

      • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not sure I understand. I should be able to fork a public repo across instances, no? Why bother otherwise?

        • Slotos@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Federation has nothing to do with that capability. git clone exists since the beginning of git.

          • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            hmmmm… I see your point. Maybe I wasnt explaining my point clear enough. Right now, I cant see someones fork of some software if I’m on some gitlab which is not federated afaik. I should have said discoverability I guess. Does that make more sense?

            • r00ty@kbin.life
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I mean, not saying anyone should, because evading copyright is bad. But technically, you could run say forgejo as an onion service. Connecting git to clone from it would take some extra steps but, if hidden well it’d make it somewhat harder to take down.

              • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Evading oppressive mechanics is always a great idea imho but I digress.

                I’m not really talking about making it unable to be taken down, which is already what happens when you put it in a non public repo. I’m talking about exhausting the corpo and damaging their image for going after people using software to play their bought games on their pc. It could kick off a trend of peeps shaming corpos (especially nintendo) for going after legit players who want control of their devices and property. (whoever feels like pointing out that “technically you just own a license”, just dont).

                • nintendiator@feddit.cl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I’m talking about exhausting the corpo and damaging their imag

                  All you’ll be exhausting is an AI. They’re using AIs now to write the DMCA requests, which actually does lead me to wonder if such takedown requests are even legal (an AI can’t, to my knowledge, legally represent the interests of a legal person). But the point is, if you’re thinking of “exhausting a corpo” you’re thinking it wrong.