Popular renderings dress her in thick, reddish-brown fur, with her face, hands, feet and breasts peeking out of denser thickets.This hairy picture of Lucy, it turns out, might be wrong.Technological advancements in genetic analysis suggest that Lucy may have been naked, or at least much more thinly veiled.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    So you’d rather for them to have written a different article, with similar substance, but not [as thoroughly] related to their area of study?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      No, I’m just not really on board with this one. As I said.

      I don’t care what articles Ms. Magazine decides to publish. It’s not my magazine.