Steps

1: Use browser Addon uBlock Origin or other extension for picking and disabling HTML such as Tampermonkey etc.

  1. Open Discord in Browser

  2. Pick and make filter against elements:

discord.com##.scrollerBase__65223.thin__62e51.content_b28aab
discord.com##.rootWithShadow_d20cd6.fullscreenOnMobile__05784.small_f8e677.root_a28985
discord.com##.withLayer__29ace.backdrop__1a911

NOTE: This will also bug the preview for files when you click them, but it’s still usable.

For those of you who wish to backup Discord posts and conversations, you have a few choices.

  1. If you are very tech-savvy you can transfer everything over to a Matrix Self-Host, then take it offline so that it functions as a storage medium.

  2. You can use several open source tools such as Tyrrrz’s discord chat exporter

Be warned: leaking your Discord User Authentication Token could be potentially harmful.

  • edric@lemm.eeEnglish
    1·
    5 months ago

    Circling back. It looks like they did something this week and the filter no longer works. Any chance you know of a new filter?

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.todayOPEnglish
      11·
      5 months ago

      By now you should have already sent in the email opting out of forced arbitration and/or backed up your history anyways. This issue started over 2 months ago.

  • PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    1·
    7 months ago

    This got me thinking the other day… How on earth does tapping a square on your phone become a legally binding agreement? There’s no signature, verification of identity, etc., so how is me just saying “It wasn’t me who clicked yes”, not enough to totally invalidate this “agreement”? Especially in the case of forced arbitration clauses, if I don’t even provide my real information to Discord, how on earth could anyone legally say I can’t sue them?

  • cum@lemmy.cafeEnglish
    1·
    7 months ago

    There’s a better opt out called delete your account and uninstall lol. This won’t actually do anything. Do you plan on actually taking them to court? Or how do you prove what they’re doing with your data? This is just an illusion of choice.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.todayOPEnglish
      1·
      7 months ago

      The mere notion of refusing to agree to forced terms is soothing and gives a vindicating feeling, but yes it’s clear that long term leaving the platform is the best solution.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    0·
    7 months ago

    Don’t forget to email the opt out notice for forced arbitration before May 15th, as that can apply regardless of whether you delete your account or not.

    • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      7 months ago

      Yikes btw, their arbitration agreement is rather nasty. A bunch of weird convoluted rules about mass arbitration. Some situations where it looks like they could demand in person appearance at hearings. Rather intimidating language about settlement offers made just before the arbitration hearings – basically if you turn down an offer and then get awarded less than what they offered you’re on the hook for paying all their fees from the time of the settlement offer, etc.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            1·
            7 months ago

            As an American, I like the general idea of private courts provided:

            • both parties consent to the court used
            • any decisions can be appealed to a public court
            • private judges must be actively practicing (passed the bar) with a public record
            • if the dispute is between a customer and the company, the company shoppers any costs, unless a public judge rules otherwise if the customer appeals

            Binding arbitration agreements suck though, and I think they are or should be unconstitutional.