But of course we all know that the big manufacturers don’t do this not because they can’t but because they don’t want to. Planned obsolescence is still very much the name of the game, despite all the bullshit they spout about sustainability.

  • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I understand people’s desire for a headphone port, but I really don’t understand the hate for devices that don’t have one. It would be one thing if they vendor-locked Bluetooth headphones so you had to use theirs, but it really just seems like a common sense move in a world where Bluetooth reigns supreme.

    As long as a USB-C adapter still provides the same functionality, I really don’t see anyone’s choices being taken away. If it is one less physical port on the device that helps streamline the hardware, I’m all for it too.

    And if it is a dealbreaker, you don’t have to buy a fairphone.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m with you. The hate has always seemed a bit like a first world problem.

    • blssflbreeze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      it’s partially because we are running out of options that have the headphone jack, and the only reason to remove them is to boost sales of more expensive bluetooth sets. Bluetooth really doesn’t reign supreme yet because wired headphones are still more convenient, cheaper to produce, and last longer than their bluetooth counterparts. the only reason it’s so common is because it keeps getting removed from phones so people don’t have a choice in the matter.