• Lath@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Probably because they’re basically poison that has to be filtered out and fucks up your liver and kidneys.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      If we forbid things just because they are mildly toxic, we would need to forbid almost everything. Including oxygen and water.

    • Mesophar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ok, but there are plenty of other items that that do that as well. It’s not a call out of “all drugs, including tobacco and alcohol”. It’s not a callout of microplastics. So there’s something specific to alcohol.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        So there’s something specific to alcohol.

        Being widespread. One bad set of laws in bad place in bad time (propination laws in eastern Europe in XVIII-XIX century) caused untold suffering and is keenly felt to this day, showing how easily hundreds of millions of people can be fucked up by poisonous commodity.

        I’m not for entirely banning alcohol, but only because it would be rather futile, but for restrictions in its selling and far going educational campaigns to finally get rid of it - and it is possible, even if not entirely, looking at the decline of consumption of other poison, tobacco.