• The Menemen!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      True to a degee, but too many international journalists still depend on that plattform. Makes it hard to ditch it completly, until finally one of the alternatives really pick up.

  • Maxnmy's@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Please. I truly want to see my favorite people on Twitter get driven to a better platform.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Unfortunately, they’re going to Threads. Although I guess that’s technically better. But better in the sense that drinking piss is better than eating shit.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I work in bot protection and it’s a sound idea but doesn’t really work in practice. As long as there’s more than 1$ of value to be gained it’s worth it for the bot makers.

    This also makes it so that botting is only accesible to select few actors that have the required resources i.e. russian troll farms or large bot networks from china, in turn this increases their value. This is very good for them.

    Reality is that the only way to stop bots is to constantly change up the detection system. This is called a “cat and mouse” sort of problem and it really is the only way to do it. The attacker always has to catch up and it can be trivial that takes them couple of hours to do but it also reveals behavior patterns for marking bot accounts. This actually works really well in practice but requires a lot of dev resources and many companies low-key like bots which is another thread entirely.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        develop systems that can identify unwanted users like bots, spammers, people who abuse the product and break ToS etc. Most bad actors are very dumb but fighting this at scale is actually very interesting. Also most bots (like 90%) are just scrapers (data collectors) especially when it comes to Twitter which has absurd API pricings but cost almost nothing to scrape lol

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        As Kungen already answered - stats! You can sell bot traffic as real traffic which inflates your numbers.

        For stuff like social media, bots increase engagement too. Many new products and networks actually generate a lot of fake content to attract organic growth. I.e. if bot likes your comment you’re likely to engage more. If it likes your product review you’re likely to review more stuff etc.

        Tracking bots can also generate reverse analytics. For example if you know that your competitors are scraping fishing equipment data from your store it could mean they’re working on a competing fishing related product.

        Lastly, you can feed fake data to bots to manipulate competitors. This is somewhat illegal (no real legal precedent yet afaik though its a clear intent to harm other businesses) but it can really powerful in the wrong hands.

        Edit: worth nothing that a lot of bot traffic is good. Sometimes you want to be scraped as it is a form of organic engagement and increases the value of your data and often backlinks growth (e.g. indexers like Google etc)

  • shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not a fan of him, nor a twitter user, but as far as free speech is concerned, that should mean your opinion is not censored, but the platform doesn’t have to be free to use, but if it doesn’t discriminate opinions, and everyone is allowed to make an account, and everyone has to pay the same

    That’s equal treatment, and isn’t going against free speech.

    • alekwithak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      None of that was ever true for Twitter, anyway. It wasn’t true before Musk bought it and it’s only got worse.

  • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s completely absurd that he’s saying this as an anti-bot measure. The bots exist because they generate revenue for the scumbags behind them, a small fee is just going to be part of doing business for them. He’s not trying to stop bots, he’s trying to monetize them and use them as an excuse to charge everyone. “The bot problem” will never be fixed and will be used as an excuse for every anti-user measure they put forward.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It has a “chicken or egg” problem. There are better alternatives, except many don’t use them because their userbase is still on Xitter, and said userbase don’t want to move away from Xitter because their faves are still there. I deleted it from my phone, but I keep my account in case I need to look up something there, or to not get my identity stolen and exploited.

  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Meanwhile, everyone will bitch about the absurdity of this and how shitty Musk and his followers are, then continue to use the platform daily as though it’s an essential service. Anyone who hasn’t jumped ship my now is either complacent or wholly supportive.

  • nikita@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This seems like further confirmation of that theory that I saw posted on here that the Saudi oil barons funded Elon’s purchase of Twitter for the sole purpose of destroying it. They want to silence online discussions of climate change and other left wing topics.

    Combined with Reddit being owned by Tencent, Facebook being eternally evil, and TikTok being unconducive to any form of coherent dialogue, there are not many places for left wing discourse on the internet anymore.

    • exscape@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      “climate change and other left wing topics”… I know that’s basically how it works in some countries, but it’s insane to consider certain scientific facts left wing, and we really shouldn’t support such statements.

  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I genuinely have to wonder if Musk is intentionally trying to kill Xitter, because if he’s actually trying to recoup his “investment” he’s going about it completely the wrong way

    • paf0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maybe he’s just trying to make it cheap enough for Dorsey to buy it from him.

  • Sagrotan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I never got the appeal of twitter/x, and I never will. I get other social networks, some more, some less, but Twitter’s just stupid IMO. I hope that shit’ll die sooner than later.

      • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Twitter was great for watching Jan 6 unfold, there’s no replacement for the kind of unfiltered crowd sourced information gathering it enabled

  • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Meanwhile, the neuralink patient zero gave a beautiful presentation of what has been happening with that project and it isn’t news because it goes against the Elon Bad narrative