I’ve seen them called “Stop Lines”, “Balk Line”, etc. The thick line painted on the road at a Stop Sign.

You’re supposed to stop before the line, but a lot of the time there’s a bush or other obstruction so you can’t see any crossing traffic. You have to creep forward until you can see anything.

Is there a reason for this? Is it done on purpose? It makes sense if there’s a crosswalk or something, but I see it a lot where there shouldn’t be any pedestrian activity.

  • OfCourseNot@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Others had pointed the reasons, I wanted to add that you have to stop at the line, and if something obstructs your sight (at stop signs, not traffic lights) you have to go a bit forward and stop again.

    • Graphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Speaking of obstructing your sight, I’ve been test driving a lot bc I’m looking for my midlife crisis car rn. I’ve never had a shorter car before and I’m looking at maybe a Porsche rn which sits low.

      The amount of bushes placed where you need to see oncoming traffic is stupid. Also all the blackout tinted windows that keep you from seeing traffic in front. I’m second guessing owning a shorter car

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s a good thing in a way because it’d mean if you adhere to road rules, then you’d have to crawl extra slow and stop more often around these areas, and Porsche etc drivers are the ones specifically where that is often a necessity due to how difficult their cars can be to spot.