Please explain my confused me like I’m 5 (0r 4 or 6).

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    That makes sense, but trying to square that off with the idea that the year 2000 is the start of the 21st century is hurting my head.

    If year 1 is the 1st year, then surely the first year of the 21st century should be 2001?

    • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      the idea that the year 2000 is the start of the 21st century is hurting my head.

      That may be because it is not. The first century was years 1 to 100. The second was 101 to 200. The 21st is therefore 2001 to 2100.

      What you’re probably referring to is the “cultural century” which was considered to have started when the lead digit changed from 1 to 2. The same thing happened quite recently when some people argued 2020 was the start of a new decade (again, it wasn’t)

      • eatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I hate it when people say it wasnt the start of a new decade, it’s a shit argument, why does it matter what the first year was, 2014 - 2024 is also a decade, and 2pm aest September 22nd 2024 will also be the start of a new decade. There is nothing wrong with saying 2020 was the start of a new decade. (again, it was)