• ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Good lord.

      My impression of Lemmy lately:

      <something good happens, gets reported>

      Lemmy: that’s cool, but babies get cancer.

      Like, come on…

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I agree in sentiment, but this headline is objectively depressing.

        < New home - yay! >

        < Decades after a racist mob burned her old home down >

        Well fuck.

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You might need to talk to someone about potential clinical depression. That doesn’t seem like a healthy takeaway.

          It’s nice to see someone who has struggled have good things happen. Potentially nicer to see than a report on someone who hasn’t struggled as much.

          Although it’d be nicer if bad things didn’t happen. But they always will to some extent.

          It’s nice when things get better.

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I mean, yes, but the only way you don’t see the implications of the headline is if you’re willfully ignoring them.

            I agree, it’s nice that her kids and grandkids have a house they can live in. What about those 85 years she went without a home? That’s a shitload of time an entire lifetime, and what about the other people who have had horrible things done to them for horrible reasons? Who will receive nothing?

            I’m with you, yes this is a nice thing. It’s not at all unhealthy to draw these conclusions from the story, however.

            • ripcord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              It’s normal to note and even be upset about the bad thing that happened decades ago.

              However, when it’s the primary focus of your response to a news article like this - that a bad thing happened decades ago, instead of the actual news that a good thing just happened (and that the bad thing is context and why it might be extra meaningful) - that seems unhealthy.

              • Jax@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                You seem to have missed me pointing out that countless other bad things have happened, which is the ‘orphan crushing machine’ point.

                • ripcord@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Then that would be a reaction to an article about those things, not this one.

                  Especially in this community. This one is supposed to be a tiny place where people can actually find good things that happened. Every other community apparently is for focusing on the bad stuff. So it’s nice to have one single one that isn’t, just for a break.

                  If you can’t find a way to avoid pathologically trying to focus everyone’s attention on other bad shit in a rare article about something good, then at the very least it might be a good idea to block the community.

      • scutiger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s not the point. The meme of the orphan crushing machine is that headlines report an orphan being saved as something uplifting when really the problem is that someone built a machine for the express purpose of crushing orphans, and it’s still running.

        It’s not uplifting news that this lady gets to move back home. It’s horrifying that her house was torched by a racist mob and she hasn’t been able to live there for 85 years.

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Opal Lee is single-handedly keeping Texas a place worth making better.

    I’m exaggerating, but only a little. She’s a god-damned saint.

  • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    What an awkwardly-worded title.

    new Texas home…after racist mob burned it down

    Burned what down? New house?

      • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        ‘Grandmother of Juneteenth’ handed keys to new Texas home 85 years after racist mob burned it down

        This implies that 85 years ago a racist mob burned down the new Texas home that she was just handed the keys to, which makes no sense.

        A better way to word it would be “‘Grandmother of Juneteenth’ handed keys to new Texas home 85 years after racist mob burned her childhood house down”. I get that it’s at the same site, but the home she’s moving into isn’t the same one that was burned down.

        Whether it’s obvious or not has no bearing on the fact that it’s an awkwardly-worded title.