48 seconds. I predict a glut of helium. balloons for everyone

  • remotelove@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah. Actually using that heat is the next challenge, I suppose. If I am not mistaken (and I am often mistaken), they are not actually using the reaction to power the reactor yet.

    It’s all math, basically. If they measure more energy coming out than they put in, it’s considered a win.

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      How would they use it to power a reactor? Is it like a regular nuclear reactor where you essentially boil water to power a steam turbine?

      I swear a part of my inner child died the day I found out that nuclear reactors are essentially big kettles.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It’s likely going to create steam, just like a reactor today. It is a very effective way to turn a turbine for a generator, after all. All the bits that actually start and maintain the reaction need fuck tons of electricity, so the reaction can literally power itself when attached to a generator.

        While there are a ton of formulas for converting energy from heat, to steam, to mechanical energy and then into electricity, it’s all basically the same: more power out than you put in is a good reaction.

        Almost forgot, water is dual function. It cools the equipment and it acts as an energy transport. I believe ammonia is more efficient in some circumstances, but water is better for obvious reasons.