Weird title. Why say woman’s son?
Weird title. Why say woman’s son?
Because it is more captivating when it starts with that good old stereotype:
“Man saves woman”
Because she isn’t the topic of the story, and it’s not the strangers son…
Are you offended because someone said woman ?
If anything, the article should have named Andrew Podolak way before half the article was done because was the one who did something and the only point of the story.
If she is irrelevant, just call him a 4 year old…?
How did you get to this person being offended by women? What the fuck?
Every male is a woman’s son, so saying that in the title is not necessary. The woman is not really relevant in this story except as a bystander.
Not according to some people…
This is great and all, but why are 4 year olds in danger of getting hit by flying pucks in the first place? Shouldn’t the barriers be tall enough to prevent this?
This story doesn’t exactly fit the orphan-crushing-machine criteria, but it has a similar vibe…
“If you didn’t see it, here’s slo-mo…”
Yep, still can’t see it.
They mispronounced “slide show”
