Looks like it’s still in the planning stages. But looks like a cool project.

  • doccod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    At the moment of you writing this comment, the person in question had downvoted 3 of your comments and 4 of your posts over a span of months. Seems far from a pattern, but the following up and singling out of a particular user doesn’t look good. I’d suggest not focusing on who likes or doesn’t your content since the optics of an admin asking users the reasons for their votes is a very bad one.

    • rglullis@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      That is far far from my “focus”. I don’t mind criticism. I don’t even mind people who openly state reasons to not like me or what I am doing. My problem is what others described: downvoting without actionable feedback.

      I am more used to the Hacker News style of moderation, where the mods are used to take a first course of action to (politely) point out what was “wrong” with someone’s action and ask them to stop their behavior. Only unabashed repeat offenders get banned. My “calling out” was an attempt to do that, after a private message went unanswered.

          • AchtungDrempels@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Oh you downvoted me because you think you’d be a great mod 😂

            But you are not a mod here, thank god.

            Making it seem like the person was following you around to harass downvote you, fucking dumbass.

              • AchtungDrempels@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                I think an obvious insult is nicer than trying to smear the person downvoting as some notorious downvoter with pretend “admin knowledge”.

                I guess you’re a fan of this because they also called out your downvoters before. You are the good guys and the downvoters are the bad guys.

            • rglullis@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              I downvoted you then for the same reason that I am downvoting you now: because you are more interested in making personal attacks and calling names than in a productive conversation.

              Also, please re-read my comment. There is an experienced moderator from a reasonably large instance saying “sometimes all that is needed is to call out bad behavior and ask people to stop it”. If you don’t agree with it, fine, but don’t go around saying that only someone “emotionally unstable” would act this way.

              In the spirit of “just ask people to stop”, I’ll say this: Can you please drop the needless aggression and name-calling? Let’s try to assume good intentions first?

              • AchtungDrempels@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I think what you do is bad behaviour, worse than just somebody downvoting something. I have told you when i first saw you do this, but you’re still doing it.

                What i say about you is what i think about you.

                • rglullis@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I have no recollection of interacting with you until yesterday, and a quick search is showing you only calling me creepy in a response to someone else because I called out two other commenters who, yes, were pretty much downvoting everything in a discussion about moving away from lemmy.ml.

                  Then and now, you are responding to something you don’t like and you are resorting to make it personal (calling names, making value judgments) instead of making it about the behavior (“hey, why are you doing X? Can you please stop it?”). Do you understand the difference?

                  • AchtungDrempels@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I adressed your behaviour, f.e. your attempt to create a false impression of their downvote behaviour to make yourself look more reasonable, before i called you a dumbass. But i get it, you’d rather let that one slide.

                    I’ll definitely keep chiming when you pull this in the future, as i don’t think your self righteous ass will take the ratio hint.

      • Kayn@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        My problem is what others described: downvoting without actionable feedback.

        This is exactly why I prefer instances that have downvotes disabled.

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yeah, I am still of the opinion that downvotes can be an important source of signal, but given the prevalence of “I don’t like this, therefore I don’t like you, here is my downvote”, I’m starting to reconsider it.

          In my ideal world we would get rid of up/downvotes and just use emoji reactions as a multi-dimensional form of evaluating content quality.