• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Never use biometrics to lock anything. You can be forced to push a finger to a sensor, or your head forcibly held still for a facial scan.

    Only use passwords/passcords. only they are secure against this totalitarian bullshit.

    They’ll still put you in jail on fake charges if you refuse to give your passcode, but at least your datas safe and now your case is unlawful imprisonment instead of relying on octogenarian judges thinking its okay to force compliance with a biometric.

    • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Only use passwords/passcords. only they are secure against this totalitarian bullshit.

      Oh sweet summer child. Password is as easily beaten out of you as biometric.

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If we’re talking about a situation where they can just straight up beat you legally until you give them a passcode, then what’s on your phone likely doesn’t make a difference in the outcome.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    There was already a case with this same fingerprint outcome a few years ago. Biometrics are not protected from seizure.

    However, passcodes still are. Last time I checked you cannot be compelled to surrender your passcode locking your phone.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Which is also why both iPhone and Android have panic/lockdown modes.

      For my android, if I rapidly tap the fingerprint reader or the power key five times in a row, it locks down and will only be unlocked with a password. I understand iPhones have this same activation method too. Different Android models might have different activations, so you’d have to check the settings.

      You can also just hold the power key and shut the phone down, because it’s pretty standard now that upon a reboot you have to put in the pin first before you can use fingerprint.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Which is also why both iPhone and Android have panic modes.

        When you are encountering police that would be seizing your phone in the near future, I HIGHLY RECOMMEND AGAINST quickly shoving your hand in your pocket to try to lock your phone.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Joke’s on them. The fingerprint scanner on my Pixel 7 is so shit it doesn’t work even when I want it to.

  • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    So when comes the ruling that they can just straight up execute you without having to do the hustle of a fake investigation on themselves?

  • pkill@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Luckily LineageOS and GrapheneOS have a lockdown mode (Graphene also supports disabling fingerprint for screen unlock), though rebooting your phone usually doesn’t cause you to lose any work since everything autosaves as phones kill background apps to save battery and memory. Separate user profiles for situations like protests or certain contexts (preferably with some dummy data to make it not look to sus) are also useful.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s very unlikely the OS actually kills apps in the background as that would legitimately break many apps and is a source of frustration from other OEMs.

      There’s a difference between killing an app and putting it into a less active state.

      When you swipe an app away from your recent lists, it’s not actually killing it, its just putting it in a different state.

      When your force stop an app from its info under settings, you’re actually killing it. Nothing about it is alive.

      When you actually kill an app, things like alarms stop functioning. The app needs to be alive for the alarm to function. Even so much that when you set an alarm on your phone, you need to set the alarm again after rebooting as they arent permanently stored and if the phone is rebooted the app needs to be woken up and the alarms re set. There’s a whole development workflow to do that.

      There was a brief period many years ago when an OEM actually force killed an app when swiped away from recents without fully understanding the implications and they later reverted the change.

      Push notifications of any type would also completely cease functioning.

      • Tebbie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I always hated how android phones seem to have everything running. This certainly explains why there is no proper task manager in them.

    • GekkoState@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Biometrics are fine, just use lockdown of you get pulled over or are going throgh TSA.

      You can still activate the camera/camcoder by double tapping power on a Pixel even in lockdown.

  • Johnmannesca@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Turn on pin-secured boot and shut off the phone and a fingerprint should be useless now, right? And don’t the cops have a lot people’s fingerprints on record? Are we just waiting for a cop with a higher than room temperature IQ to come up with a duplicating method to get in people’s phones without warrant or even probable cause?

    • mansfield@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The initial pin that most folks have to enter is needed to decrypt the partition with user data. This is not 100% foolproof for keeping LEOs out since there are many known, and likely more unknown, ways to brute force these but it is still the best option.

    • endhits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The constitution is only used to protect property rights of the owners and the power of managers. The working class is not often afforded it’s protections.

    • brianorca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      In this case, the defendant was on parole, so there was already a court order allowing the search of his devices.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Payne conceded that “the use of biometrics to open an electronic device is akin to providing a physical key to a safe” but argued it is still a testimonial act because it “simultaneously confirm[s] ownership and authentication of its contents,” the court said. “However, Payne was never compelled to acknowledge the existence of any incriminating information. He merely had to provide access to a source of potential information.”

      If you can be compelled to hand over a key to a safe, I can see how that translates to putting your thumb on the scanner.

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Don’t use fingerprint to unlock phone. They can force your fingerprint, but they can’t force your password … So just use a password. Problem solved

  • capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    On iOS hold power and volume up until SOS/power off options appear. TouchID/FaceID is now disabled until the next time you input the code.

    Also you’re experiencing some amnesia due to the stress of interacting with a cop.