• Cossty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Please pull out of EU, it will be so much easier to convince more of my family to use signal.

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Meta seemed to think that was a threat that would get the EU to cave to their demands and the regulators’ response was basically

      Willy Wonka sarcastically saying, “Stop. Don’t. Come back.”

      • 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        To be fair, tech companies can do whatever they want in the EU, No party would ever want to be responsible for WhatsApp, Windows, or ChatGPT not being available anymore.

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Until the EU don’t use the same tactic: follow the law or get out.

          And what Meta is not understanding is that if the EU will arrive at this point, the “follow the law” will be as pedantic as it can be. And maybe even a little more.

          Meta should learn from what happened during the Brexit’s negotiations.

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I hope you’re right, but the EU hasn’t had many overwhelming successes when it comes to pushing that particular boulder up the hill.

            • gian @lemmy.grys.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Well, the micro-USB and USB-C or the GDPR examples are here. Maybe is a little more difficult with services since it is way faster to change a service then a law.

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    arguing that it’s not real consent if the only alternative is shelling out yet another monthly subscription fee

    Very true, and hopefully many other verdicts will follow, like "It’s not real consent if…this or that.

    This dark pattern has started to spread everywhere already.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Prior to joining Meta, she was a partner working on technology issues and co-chair of Covington & Burling’s global data practice. Erin collaborates with policymakers and experts on Meta’s products and features and is deeply involved in legislative and regulatory efforts around data protection, data portability, advertising, and Al.

      E.g. ex lawyer working for a firm that ensured companies could sell and use as much data as possible and defended them if they got sued or fined. Now in charge of “Privacy,” e.g. making sure Meta can sell and use as much private data as possible. It’s literal doublespeak

      • Murdoc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, when I saw “Chief Privacy Officer”, my first thought was “Ministry of Truth”, “Ministry of Peace”, etc.

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Sounds to me that Meta defines privacy in a very particular way. You’re still going to give all of your data to Meta, but anything outside this transaction is in the realm of privacy where you can have rights and settings.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Say one decides to pay…what guarantees do I get that my data won’t be used or that I won’t get targeted?